Legal Opinion

Price v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1984No. L.A. 31945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Does the “going and coming rule” preclude an award of workers’ compensation benefits to an employee who is injured while waiting for his place of employment to open?

I

Approximately 7:50 a.m. on June 20, 1980, petitioner, Andrew Leo Price, was injured outside his place of employment. Price had arrived at work at 7:45 a.m. Since no lot was provided for employee parking, Price parked his car on the same side of the street as his employer’s premises.

Although Price’s job officially began at 8 a.m., he generally arrived at work early. Often the premises were open before 8 a.m. If…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mason v. Lake Dolores Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. North Atlantic Casualty & Surety Insurance v. William D.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  4. Todd v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Wright v. St. of CACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API