Legal Opinion
New Haven Sand Blast Co. v. Dreisbach
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 8, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The present action arises upon a motion, based upon the judgment heretofore rendered against the defendant in an action between the same parties, praying that the court issue an order directing the defendant to execute and deliver to the plaintiff assignments covering the British and Canadian patent rights to the so-called Washburn and Sheldon invention. The former action (reported in 102 Conn. 169, 128 Atl. 320) was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, who had been its president, general manager and director, and pursued as to the first and second counts of the complaint.
The first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- New Milford Water Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Telesco v. TelescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.