Legal Opinion

Miller v. Sinjen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1923No. 6169PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity brought by appellee (hereinafter called plaintiff) to recover property owned by him which was seized by the Alien Property Custodian during the war with Germany, and while appellee was living in that country. The property was seized by virtue of the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917. 40 Stat. 411, c. 106, as amended by Act March 28, 1918, 40 Stat. 459, c. 28, and Act Nov. 4, 1918, 40 Stat. 1020, c. 201, and Act July 11, 1919, 41 Stat. 35, c. 6, and Act June 5, 1920, 41 Stat. 977, c. 241.

The constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Urtetiqui v. D'ArcySupreme Court of the United States · 1835

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gillars v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Max Shachtman v. John Foster Dulles, Individually and as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Josephberg v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Stadtmuller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. Joaquin Augusto Peignand v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API