Urtetiqui v. D'Arcy
Supreme Court of the United States
IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland. The defendants in error instituted an action of assumpsit in the circuit court, and in the declaration, stated themselves to be citizens of Maryland, and that the defendant was a subject of the king of Spain; The declaration contained the common counts.
Read the full summary
IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland. The defendants in error instituted an action of assumpsit in the circuit court, and in the declaration, stated themselves to be citizens of Maryland, and that the defendant was a subject of the king of Spain; The declaration contained the common counts. The defendant below, Domingo Urtetiqui, .pleaded the general issue, and also a plea in abatement, alleging that Domingo D’Arbel, one of the plaintiffs, was not, at the impetration of •the writ, a citizen of the United States, or of anyone of them. To this plea…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
delivered^ the opinion of the Court. This case comes up on a writ of érror from the circuit court, of the Maryland district. It is an action of assumpsit. The declaration contains the common money coúnts, and also counts for goods sold and delivered, work, labourland services, and an insimul computassent.. There is an averment in the declaration, that the plaintiffs are citizens of the state of Maryland, and the defendant an alien, and subject of the king of Spain. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and also a plea in abatement, alleging that Domingo. D’Arbel, one of the plain tiffs;…
2Cited by41 opinions
- Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zivotofsky v. KerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. LaubSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Witold PlutaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.