Legal Opinion
Stadtmuller v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 19, 1926No. 242PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This suit is brought under section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115%e) to recover property alleged to belong to the plaintiff, and which was seized by the Alien Property Custodian, and is now in the custody of the, Tifeasurer of the United States. The District Court dismissed the complaint.
The plaintiff was bom in Germany, and still is technically a German citizen. He came to the United States in 1890, and has ever since that time been, with the exception of an absence in Europe hereinafter referred to, a resident in…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The Venus, Rae, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Wolfe v. Hartford Life & Annuity InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. PetrowskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Josephberg v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Kaku Nagano v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- McGrath v. ZanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.