Legal Opinion
Fuentes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 21, 2011No. 10-861CPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
On December 14, 2010, Plaintiff Efrain Fuentes filed a Complaint alleging that he is entitled to back pay because the United States Army improperly separated him from active duty while he was injured. Plaintiff alleges that his injury left him disabled, and therefore, Army regulations required the Army to refer him to a medical board before it separated him from active duty. Even though he was separated because his term of active duty ended, Plaintiff asserts that he was entitled to remain on active duty past his term’s end date pending completion of a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Albino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kemp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Prophet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.