Legal Opinion

Lerner v. Bergdoll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1925No. Appeal, 335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sabler,

Plaintiff was injured in a building owned by the defendant, and claimed it was due to the failure to keep in repair an electric lift there installed. Each of four tenants occupied separate floors, the Kinney Company being the lessee of the first, and also of the basement. The one elevator served all, but whether the duty to keep it in a reasonably safe condition rested upon the lessor or the tenants was a matter in dispute. If the former, defendant was liable in case the necessary supervision was not exercised, and loss resulted by reason thereof (Sloan v. Hirsch,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herstine v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Fleccia v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Huey v. GahlenbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Sloan v. HirschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Silver v. HauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hoffner Et Ux. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Schell v. Miller North Broad Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Kelly v. Northampton County Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API