Legal Opinion

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2015No. 09-99018PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge W. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge BEA.

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner James McKinney was sentenced to death, and his sentence was affirmed by the Arizona Supreme Court on de novo review in 1996. State v. McKinney, 185 Ariz. 567, 917 P.2d 1214 (1996). A three-judge panel of this court denied McKinney’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2013). We granted rehearing en banc and withdrew our three-judge panel opinion. McKinney v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2014). In his federal habeas petition, McKinney challenges both his…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Early v. PackerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. David Ramirez v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Runningeagle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Michael Apelt v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Frank Atwood v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API