Legal Opinion
People v. Gibson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court’s Sandoval ruling allowing the prosecutor to cross-examine defendant about the facts underlying a prior conviction of endangering the welfare of a child was not an abuse of discretion (see, People v Bennette, 56 NY2d 142, 147-148). Defendant failed to object to the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant and the prosecutor’s comments…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BennetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. PruchnickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.