Legal Opinion

United States v. Starusko, John

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 5, 1984No. 83-5479PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal by the government, brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we are asked to decide whether the district court abused its discretion in precluding a key government witness from testifying at trial in a criminal case as a sanction for the government’s failure to turn over to the defendant certain exculpatory evidence pri- or to trial. We hold that although the government withheld materially exculpatory evidence, in direct violation of a valid district court order, it was an abuse of discretion for the district court to issue a preclusion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. PaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Buehl v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Jackie Presser Harold Friedman and Anthony HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API