Legal Opinion

United States v. Holmes

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 25, 1987No. ACM 26249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, is the basis for R.C.M. 914. This provision- requires the military judge to make available to the defense, after a witness has testified, any “statements” possessed by the prosecution that the witness has made. Its purpose is to allow the defense access to matters that may be used for impeachment. See United States v. Myers, 14 M.J. 935 (A.F.C.M.R.1982). The appellant, in a Motion for Appropriate Relief, sought to preclude a crucial government witness from testifying because a “statement" he made to law enforcement investigators…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PadinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. MyersU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. BarberU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. MeyerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HamiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API