United States v. Raymond A. Ridley
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appealing from a conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, appellant ' makes three principal contentions. 1 The first is that the indictment should be dismissed because appellant was without counsel at his arraignment. The plea entered was that of not guilty, and the record indicates that appellant, who had been free on personal recognizance since the day of his arrest, represented to the District Court that he would retain counsel on his own. It was not until some two weeks after arraignment that appellant, still free pending trial, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, at which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles McGill v. United States of America, Walter M. Hinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Calvin C. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Ernest L. Stith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Barnett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Billie A. Bryant, United States of America v. Benjamin MurdockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Boone v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Edward Adio BadruCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- George M. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.