Legal Opinion

Durdahl v. Bank of Casper

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1986No. 85-279PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Bank of Casper (Bank), the lender, in an amount of $54,-535.29 for unpaid principal and accrued interest, plus accruing interest, $5,000.00 attorney’s fees, and costs of $27.63, on a secured promissory note which was in default. Appellant, Lyle Durdahl, the borrower, claims that material factual issues exist which preclude summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Appellant Durdahl framed the issues:

1. “The question of how much, if any, money is owed to the appellee is a material question of fact and precludes summary…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Garner v. HickmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Western National Bank of Casper v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Jones Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pekas v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API