Legal Opinion
Abbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development, Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 15, 2008No. Civil Action 00-1720 (RMU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Evidence and Arguments
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and the defendant’s motion to exclude evidence. The plaintiff, Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,344,915, also known as the “LeMaire patent.” The patent describes a protein called TBP-II, which is found in the urine of patients with a fever and binds to,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Winner International Royalty Corporation v. Ching-Rong WangCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Yeda Research & Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Alberts v. HCA INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis GmbhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Spine v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.