Legal Opinion
Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Marathon Coach, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided September 10, 2010No. 03-08-00471-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
This appeal presents substantive and procedural issues concerning the “hybrid claims resolution process” for certain civil damages claims relating to the sale of motor vehicles in Texas. See Subaru of Am., Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc., 84 S.W.3d 212, 222-26 (Tex.2002). It arises from proceedings following our decision in Buddy Gregg Motor Homes, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Board of the Texas Department of Transportation, 156 S.W.3d 91 (Tex.App.Austin 2004, pet. denied) (Buddy Gregg I). To summarize the proceedings that followed Buddy Gregg I, the private parties…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texas Health & Human Services Commission & Office of Inspector General v. Antoine Dental CenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Star Houston, Inc.// Cross-Appellant,Volvo Cars of North America, LLC N/K/A Volvo Car USA, LLC v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC N/K/A Volvo Car USA, LLC, and Board of the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles// Star Houston, Inc., and Board of the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023