Legal Opinion

Raymond Handling Concepts Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1995No. A068950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, Raymond Handling Concepts Corporation and the Raymond Corporation (petitioners) ask this court to prohibit dissemination of confidential discovery to counsel in other pending similar litigation. We decline to do so having concluded that the court did not abuse its discretion in the protective order it formulated to protect the discovery.

Procedural History — Facts

Robert Zuelzke (plaintiff and real party in interest) was injured while he was operating a stand-up forklift manufactured by petitioners. He filed suit against petitioners, alleging that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Culinary Foods, Inc. v. Raychem Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  5. Ward v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Davis v. LealDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
  3. Byrd v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Marez v. Lyft, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API