Legal Opinion

Davis v. Leal

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 18, 1999No. CIV.S-97-2432 DFL GGHPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiffs, Davis and F.D.I.C. (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) seek to compel from defendant Leal voluminous discovery including tax return information and general business records. Much of the outcome of the motion will depend on whose privilege law is applied-federal or state. To arrive at the proper determination, it is necessary to understand the nature of the claims brought, the law that will supply the “rule of decision” on the merits, and choice of law determination in actions where the F.D.I.C. is a party.

Background Facts

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
  2. Hill v. BauerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. Bible v. Rio Properties, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. United States v. Town of Lincoln Zoning Board of AppealsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. Edylne Nicolas v. American ExpressDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API