Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, Acting P. J.
Summary
Petitioner Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (Firestone), seeks extraordinary relief to compel respondent Alameda County Superior Court to set aside its order requiring Firestone to provide certain trade secret (Evid. Code, § 1060) information to real parties in the underlying personal injury action. The disclosure is subject to a protective order. (Civ. Code, § 3426.5.)
Firestone insists that on the record below respondent was required to deny the motion in its entirety or alternatively to first require real parties to pursue less intrusive alternatives to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Continental General Tire, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Crum v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.