Legal Opinion
United States v. Bell
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 25, 1986No. 84SA290PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
The United States of America appeals an order of the district court for Water Division No. 5 (water court), denying relation back of an amendment seeking reserved water rights from the Colorado River main-stem to the federal government’s original application for reserved water rights in or on federal oil shale land.1 The water court ruled that the amendment to the original application did not relate back to the time *634of filing because the United States had not fulfilled the notice requirements of C.R. C.P. 15(c). The court’s order denied the United States’ amended claim an…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Sierra Club v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Shirola v. Turkey Cañon Ranch Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.