Legal Opinion

Nealy v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The petitioner herein was granted post-conviction relief by the Marion County Circuit Court. The defendant has appealed from the granting of that relief, contending that the court erred in vacating the petitioner’s 1967 guilty plea on the ground that he was not aware of the possible maximum penalty which could be imposed.

The findings of fact of the post-conviction court show that petitioner was charged by information on July 24, 1967, with violation of ORS 167.040, sodomy, conviction of which carries a maximum penalty of fifteen years’ imprisonment. On the same day he waived indictment, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lay v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. Fletcher v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. Herron v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Taylor v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jones v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Kent v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API