Legal Opinion
Grabosky v. Tammac Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 22, 2000No. 3:CV-99-0028PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, Chief Judge.
Lynn Paul Grabosky filed this action against defendant Tammac Corporation (“Tammac”), alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 P.S. § 955(a). Mr. Grabosky contends that he was fired by Tammac because of his age (45) and medical condition (history of heart attack). While conceding that he is not disabled, Mr. Grabosky asserts that Tam-mac fired him because its decision-makers regarded…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Giuliani v. Polysciences, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Chase v. Frontier Commc'ns Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Hicks v. Tech IndustriesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.