Legal Opinion

Tecumseh Iron Co. v. Camp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Bill in Equity for Account of Iron Ore Mined and Bemoved. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Cherokee. Heard before the Hon. S. K. McSpadden. The opinion of the court in this case seems to state all the material facts. The transcript has never come to the hands of the reporter.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

— The purpose of the bill is to have an account stated between plaintiffs and defendant, and to charge defendant with one half the iron ore mined and moved from the forty acres of land described in the bill, to defendant’s furnace. Plaintiffs claim to own an undivided half interest in the land under the will of their father, which is made an exhibit to the bill, and aver that their father owned a half interest in the land at the time of his death. The bill also avers that the defendant has mined and moved 400,000 tons of ore, of the value of $40,000. The bill avers “that said Tecumseh Iron…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kirkman v. VanlierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  2. Elyton Land Co. v. Birmingham Warehouse & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Fielder v. ChildsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Knotts v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Curry v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Julian v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Johnson v. National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API