Legal Opinion

Bravin v. Mayor of Tombstone

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1893No. Civil No. 348PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Richard E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKibbey, J.

The appellant (the plaintiff below) alleged in his complaint that he had been duly elected to the office of assessor of the city of Tombstone, and became ex officio tax and license-collector, health officer, and street commissioner of that city, and, having duly qualified, was duly inducted into that office; that on the first day of April, 1891, the defendants the mayor and common council of the city of Tombstone illegally and wrongfully usurped said offices, and took possession thereof, and of the books, papers, and other effects pertaining thereto, and turned them over to the defendant…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of SurpriseArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Peterson v. SundtArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Steve Gallardo v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Levy'sArizona Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API