Legal Opinion
Deutch v. Hoffman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1985No. B008103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
Plaintiff Stuart Deutch appeals from the judgment that dismissed his complaint against his sister, defendant Muriel Hoffman, on the ground it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
At trial, both parties agreed that this bar existed unless a tolling had occurred in 1975. Appellant urged only that Code of Civil Procedure section 352, subdivision (a)3, which tolls limiting statutes if “at the time the cause of action accrued . . . [the injured party was] imprisoned on a criminal charge, or in execution under the sentence of a criminal court for a term less than for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mitchell v. GreenoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Bush v. ReidAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles Leonard Elliott v. City of Union CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Austin v. Medicis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McMullen v. HaycockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Angel Ortiz Diamond v. John Gutierrez, Officer of the Oakland Police Dept. City of Oakland, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Gerald Glen Boyden v. Barry Rubin Working Alternatives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.