Legal Opinion

Austin v. Medicis

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 21, 2018No. B277546PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavin, J.

*531*582INTRODUCTION

To prevail in a civil case, the plaintiff must assert his claims before the statute of limitations expires. But the statutory deadline may be extended-or tolled-if, among other reasons, the plaintiff is "imprisoned on a criminal charge" when the cause of action accrues. Plaintiff and appellant James R. Austin asserts breach of contract and related claims stemming from acts and omissions by defendants and respondents John Michael Medicis, Michael C. Eberhardt, Michael C. Eberhardt PLC, and Law Offices of Eberhardt and Medicis (collectively, Medicis), retained counsel who…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep'tDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. (PC) Gosztyla v. FrenchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Gosztyla v. FrenchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Kakowski v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Kakowski v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API