Legal Opinion

Sparrow v. Sparrow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1927No. 26,118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, J. -

• Pending this action for the recovery of money on an antenuptial contract, plaintiff, wife of defendant, died, and the action has been continued by her executor. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The contract was executed just before the marriage of the parties, February 13, 1919. It recites that the marriage was about to be solemnized and that defendant was then the owner of property valued at over $130,000, which he expected to increase. . In consideration of those premises and the promise of defendant to make the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. York v. FernerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Schnepfe v. SchnepfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. O'Brien v. Liberty Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Shure v. Shure, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API