Gould v. Dwelling-House Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
On November 28, 1887, defendant, at its agency at. Bay City, issued a policy of insurance to plaintiff, insuring her in the sum of $250 on her dwelling-house in West Bay City. On September 20, 1889, the property insured was totally destroyed by fire. Notice of the loss was given defendant’s agent the following morning. On November 15 following, plaintiff forwarded proper proofs of loss, which defendant refused to receive on the ground that they were not furnished within the time required by the policy. There is no dispute but that the plaintiff owned the property in fee; that the building was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Savage v. . Howard Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Tubbs v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Blossom v. . Lycoming Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Washburn-Halligan Coffee Co. v. Merchants' Brick Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Dale v. Continental InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Maier v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.