Legal Opinion
Lord Const. Co. v. United States ex rel. W. E. Sexton Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 1928No. 3643PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This ease was brought here for the review of a judgment against the defendants, Lord Construction Company and Globe Indemnity Company, in the sum of $39,601.73.
The United States, acting through the Navy Department, was engaged in constructing the naval hangar at Lakehurst, N. J. On March 19, 1921, it entered into a contract with the Lord Construction Company to do certain work in erecting the hangar and upon the grounds surrounding it. The Globe Indemnity Company became surety on the bond given by the Lord Construction Company to the United States for the faithful…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- De Jianne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Headley v. CavileerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- United Steed Co. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Henke Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- The Ferber Company v. Theodore J. OndrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Ross Engineering Co. v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022