Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1991No. Cr. 900220PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Claiming defective assistance of counsel, Donald Earl Wilson applied for post-conviction relief from a criminal conviction of delivering a controlled drug. The trial court summarily denied his application. Because there were genuine issues of material fact, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Despite Wilson’s testimony that he bought, bagged, and delivered parsley, not marijuana, to a police informant for $100, a jury convicted him of violating NDCC 19-03.1-23 by delivering a controlled substance. Wilson appealed, alleging insufficient evidence and ineffective…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. RicehillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Varnson v. SatranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Mertz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sampson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API