Hayes v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for sale of liquor; from Wayne superior court— Judge Highsmith. February 12, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. Generally an assignment of error which complains of the admission of testimony, without specifying by what witness it was delivered, by reason of which the reviewing court would be compelled to search the entire record in order to properly adjudicate the exception, is too indefinite to present any question for the consideration of the court. However, in the present case, if it he assumed that the testimony in question was delivered by the agent of an express company, it was competent for the witness to testify, as he did, that he delivered certain whisky to the defendant, upon orders. No…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bragg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Peeples & Shepherd v. Butler, Stevens & BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.