Adams v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. January 7, 1918.
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles^ P. J.
1. A ground of a motion for a new trial which complains of the admission of specified testimony must state the name of the witness whose testimony is complained of. Hayes v. State, 18 Ga. App. 68 (88 S. E. 752); Peeples v. Butler, 21 Ga. App. 310 (94 S. E. 278). Under this ruling the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial can not be considered.
2. As the proof showed that the offense of having, controlling, and possessing intoxicating liquors was committed solely in October, 1917, after the passage of the prohibition law of 1917 (Ga. L. 1917, Ex. session, p.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Peeples & Shepherd v. Butler, Stevens & BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Carlisle v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
3Cited by20 opinions
- Caswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Russ v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Mapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.