Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Seattle Gas & Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1902No. 4105PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William R. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*490The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

— The proceedings in this action are on information in the nature of qua warranto, instituted December 17, 1900, in the superior court of the state of Washington for King county, by Patrick H. Winston, as attorney general of tkestate,wliO'Sues, for the state and in its behalf, on his own motion, the defendant, who is alleged to be a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Washington. The information alleges that for two year’s last past and upwards, at the city of Seattle, the said defendant has used, and still uses,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. DunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Peterson v. DillonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Winsor v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Maybury v. Mutual Gas-Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Murphy v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API