John C. Jackson, Inc. v. Hatch
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
There was no error in overruling the general demurrer. The petition meets the requisites of an action for fraud and deceit. Snow’s Laundry &c. Co. v. Ga. Power Co., 61 Ga. App. 402, 405 (6 SE2d 159); Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 727 (2) (16 SE2d 176); Norris v. Hart, 74 Ga. *625App. 444 (40 SE2d 96); Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc., 105 Ga. App. 846 (125 SE2d 717). Though he relies upon concealment of a material fact as the basis for the action, plaintiff alleges that this was done deliberately with an intent to deceive, meeting the test of Camp Realty Co. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Aderhold v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Snow's Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Norris v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMichen v. Martin Burks Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- The Hertz Corporation v. Donald Cox and Sarah C. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970