Legal Opinion

Norris v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1946No. 31420PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The essential allegations of an action for deceit are: (1) that the defendant made the representations; (3) that he knew at the time the representations were false; (3) that he made them with the intention to benefit himself or to deceive and injure the plaintiff; (4) that the plaintiff acted upon the faith of the representations; and (5) that the plaintiff sustained the alleged loss and damage as the proximate result of the false representations having been made. Young v. Hall, 4 Ga. 95, 98; Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 727 (3) (16 S. E. 2d,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Young v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Tindall v. HarkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Stovall v. RumbleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Blanchard v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. King v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Aderhold v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Clark v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API