Legal Opinion

Forefront Dermatology SC v. Tyler O. Vukmer

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 7, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00199Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FOREFRONT DERMATOLOGY SC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-CV-199 TYLER O. VUKMER, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER 1. Background Tyler O. Vukmer began working for Forefront Dermatology, SC, at its clinic in Lakewood, Colorado. (ECF No. 1-2, ¶ 1.) Although he was subject to a two-year contract and required to provide at least 120 days’ notice, Vukmer quit without notice after a little more than a year. (ECF No. 1-2, ¶ 1.) The parties’ agreement contains a liquidated damages provision requiring Vukmer to pay $750 for every day less than 120 days…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API