Legal Opinion

Raleigh-Hayward Co. v. Hull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1932No. 23372. En BancPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

For the sake of clarity, we insert the following sketch:

This action was brought to quiet title to real estate, including that portion indicated on the sketch as “property in dispute.” The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to the relief which it sought; and from a judgment entered thereon, the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are these: April 9,1908, there was filed in Pierce county, a plat of what is called “Hyada Park,” covering a tract of ground which was divided upon the plat into…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hagen v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Prewitt v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Turner v. DavissonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Woehler v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Goldsmith v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API