Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1947No. A-1059PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

This case had its beginning in an application filed by petitioner Goldsmith with the Railroad Commission of Texas for a permit to drill an oil and gas well, as an exception to Rule 37, on a tract of land 7 1/2 by 75 1/20 varas in dimensions and containing about 1/10 of an acre.. The application having been granted, respondent filed this suit to test the validity of the order and to enjoin the drilling of the well. After the evidence had been heard the trial court withdrew the case from the jury and rendered judgment that respondent take nothing by its suit. The Court of Civil Appeals,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oswald v. GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cantley v. Gulf Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Worthington v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Coxl v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krenek v. Texstar North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  2. Escondido Services, LLC v. VKM HOLDINGS, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  3. Brown v. City of TexarkanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Boothe v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. S. H. Oil & Royalty Co. v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API