Legal Opinion

United States v. Haynes

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 5, 2003No. CR. 01-20247-DPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY ACT UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND TO STRIKE THE SUPERCEDING INDICTMENT, SPECIAL FINDINGS, AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

DONALD, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aaron S. Haynes’ motions to declare the Federal Death Penalty Act unconstitutional (Dkt.# 305), to strike the superceding indictment and special findings (Dkt.# 308), to strike the notice of intent to seek the death penalty and the special findings (Dkt.# 309), and to preclude the government from seeking the death…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. FortinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. United States v. Donald FellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API