Legal Opinion
Brazos River Authority v. Gilliam
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 7, 1968No. 16934PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
The case before us grew out of a condemnation proceeding under Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.St., Title 128, “Water”, Chapter 3A, “Water Control and Improvement Districts”, Art. 7880-126, “Eminent domain”. There is no question involving procedure.
The appeal by the condemnor, the Brazos River Authority, is in complaint that amounts awarded certain condemnees were improper and/or excessive.
Predicate for some of the points of error brought forward on the appeal from the judgment of the District Court was founded upon the premise that in a trial before the court the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Chaney v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. CostelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Bruner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cherokee Water Co. v. Gregg County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- West Virginia Department of Highways v. Berwind Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.