Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Windstream Kentucky East, LLC.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 30, 2010No. Civil Action 3:09-CV-440-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Dana Bowers (“Bowers”) brings this putative class action lawsuit alleging that Defendants Windstream Kentucky East, LLC (“Windstream East”), Windstream Kentucky West, LLC (“Wind-stream West”), and Windstream Communications, Inc. (“Windstream Communications”) (collectively, ‘Windstream” or “the Windstream companies”), overcharged her for monthly telecommunications services and included misleading statements on her bills, in violation of various federal and state statutes and common law. The matter is before the Court on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Midcontinent Communications v. MCI Communications Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API