Legal Opinion
United States v. Sussman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2011No. 11-1255UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.
David Allen Sussman appeals from the district court’s revocation of his supervised release. Sussman contends that he was deprived of liberty without due process of law when federal authorities lodged a de-tainer with the county jail where he was serving a state sentence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Carlos Galaviz-Medina v. Tom Wooten, Warden, Fci, Florence, Co, and U.S. Immigration Review Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Chung Young Chew v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, Seattle DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Serrano v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021