Legal Opinion
Carlos Galaviz-Medina v. Tom Wooten, Warden, Fci, Florence, Co, and U.S. Immigration Review Board of Appeals
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1994No. 93-1387PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Galaviz-Medina filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in district court seeking review of an immigration judge’s denial of discretionary relief from deportation. The district court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that although Appellant has the right to seek…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Anthony Simmonds, A/K/A Anthony Simmons v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Tuong Huan Van Dinh v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Aguilera v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Jurado-Gutierrez v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.