Legal Opinion
Long v. Florida
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 1986No. Nos. 86-3282, 86-3410PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs brought this class action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against the Florida Retirement System (“FRS”) for sex discrimination in the administration of its pension plans. Plaintiff class consists of two subclasses: subclass A includes retired male employees who re*1545tired after March 24, 1972 and before August 1, 1983 and who elected to receive their pension benefits under one of the three joint-annuitant options of the FRS, and subclass B includes males presently employed by the FRS who are vested in the system because of ten years of service…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Richard DeLauro v. Ralph F. PortoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Virginia Hospital Ass'n v. BalilesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Maritime Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.