Legal Opinion

Arthur Colton Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 18, 1932No. 317PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Arthur Colton Company, is a manufacturer of clip attaching machines made under the patent in suit, of which it is the owner by assignment. ' The defendant, McKesson & Robbins, Inc., is a user of an alleged infringing machine manufactured by Stokes Manufacturing Company,' which is conducting the defense of this suit. Both invalidity and noninfringement were set up as defenses, but only the latter issue was considered below.

The patent relates to a machine for forming and attaching a V-shaped clip to the compressed end of a metal tube filled with tooth paste,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Triumph Trap Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Barber v. Otis Motor Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  3. Nathan v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Rockwood v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Root v. Hobbs Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Nachman Spring-Filled Corp. v. Spring Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. O'Donnell Rubber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
  5. Johnson Bros. Engineering Corp. v. Caille Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API