Legal Opinion
Johnson Bros. Engineering Corp. v. Caille Bros.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 25, 1934No. 3928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. Claims numbered 6,11,12,13, and 14 of Patent No. 1,716,982, granted to H. L. Johnson on July 11, 1929, are alleged to be infringed. Defendant denies infringement and alleges invalidity of the patent. It is admitted that Johnson Brothers Engineering Corporation is the exclusive owner of the patent and Johnson Motor Company the exclusive licensee thereof.
The alleged invention is described in the patent as a “Water Propulsion Device.” The parties hereto are and have been for a considerable number of years, extensive manufacturers…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Temco Electric Motor Co. v. Apco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kwik-Set, Inc. v. Welch Grape Juice Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Outboard Marine & Mfg. Co. v. Muncie Gear Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941