McSorley v. Bullock
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Robert H. Lindsay, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered April 25, 1910, in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for conversion.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar., C. J.
— The appellant brought this action against respondent to recover $1,361.73, the alleged reasonable *141value of a certain stock of goods, alleged to have been the-property of the appellant and converted to his own use by the respondent. The allegations of the complaint are to the-effect, that a certain stock of goods which belonged to a corporation which was in bankruptcy, the goods being in the-hands of a receiver, were to be sold by the receiver under the-direction of the referee in bankruptcy; that appellant had’ an interest in the corporation and the goods and, being desirous of purchasing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Borrow v. BorrowWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Peterson v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Carkonen v. AlbertsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Armour v. SeixasWashington Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.