Legal Opinion

People v. Couser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

This appeal requires our Court to determine whether the statutory meaning of the word “commanded” is impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. The issue arises in the context of the accomplice-liability aggravating factor which can elevate a murder to first degree rank (Penal Law § 125.27).

The word “command” has a commonly accepted meaning, and we conclude that it survives the standard due process constitutional attack. Thus, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division, holding that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. Mateo, New York County Courts1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. GlandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. People v. MowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API