Legal Opinion

Tuilaepa v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1994No. 93-5131PublishedCited by 920 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

In California, to sentence a defendant to death for first-degree murder the trier of fact must find the defendant guilty , and also find one or more of 19 special circumstances listed in Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 190.2 (West 1988 and Supp. 1994). The case then proceeds to the penalty phase, where the trier of fact must consider a number of specified factors in deciding whether to sentence the defendant to death. §190.3.* These two cases present the question whether three of the §190.3 penalty-phase factors are unconstitutionally vague under decisions of this Court construing the *970Cruel and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by920 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

915 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API