Legal Opinion

Ake v. Chancey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In May, 1931, appellee C. L. Chancey entered into contract with Spitzer Rorick Trust and Savings Bank and other non resident defendants including appellant as representative of a certain bondholders’ committee for the collection of outstanding bonds and coupons. The bonds and coupons were issued by Florida Municipalities and were held by the bondholders’ committee. The contract provided that a reasonable compensation be paid Chancey, the amount of which was to be fixed by H. C. Rorick as trustee for the bondholders’ committee.

Chancey prosecuted litigation and performed other services…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Williams v. T. R. Sweat & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Henderson v. UsherSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Cobb v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Tyler v. AkermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oxford Intern. Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Drake v. ScharlauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Heberle v. PRO Liquidating CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Ake v. ChanceyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. City of Miami v. SpurrierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API