Tyler v. Akerman
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
This writ of error was taken, to- a judgment quashing a writ of garnishment as to the municipality.
The statute provides that “Every person who shall have brought a suit to recover a debt or shall have recovered a judgment in any suit in any court of this State against any person, natural or corporate, shall have a right to a writ of garnishment, in the manner hereinafter provided, to subject any indebtedness due to the defendant by a third person, and any goods, money, chattels or effects of the defendants in the hands, possession or control of a third person. The officers, agents and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duval County v. Charleston Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Switzer v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Welch Lumber Co. v. Carter Bros. & BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Michigan Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Duval County GarnisheeSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Lakeland v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Ake v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- City of Miami v. SpurrierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Cadle Co. v. G & G ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Bailey v. BaronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.